Archive for Education Policy
A Small School Closes
Posted by: | CommentsA Small School Closes
– John Leahy
A small school in a small town will close its doors permanently this summer due to budget cuts and the children of the town will be bussed over ten miles to a neighboring town. Gone, the cozy, familiar, small-scale setting for the communities youngest members. Gone, the local venue for community extra-curricular social activities such as the girl scouts. Gone, one of the amenities that made this small town an attractive place to call home. The negative impacts of this decision go rippling through various layers of the local quality of life, many of whom are not at all related directly to education.
New York State Education Department (NYSED) has aggressively pushed a policy of consolidation under the theory that fewer and larger centralized units are more economically efficient than more numerous and smaller widely disbursed ones. The budget planning looks at elimination of duplication of services as its bottom line and does not factor in many intangibles in its unimaginative perspective. The School Board of this particular district vigorously pursued its chosen intention and pushed for five years towards its goal. Rather than using data to determine a preferred policy course, this school board made its policy decision first and then looked for data to be presented as support for its determination. Debate was quashed or avoided. Alternatives were discounted or ignored. Good old boy networking tactics were employed to keep the entrenched board members in power. NYSED supported the local board in an official hands-off (especially if we’re winning) policy.
With a policy highly dependent upon demographic projections, consolidation proponents appear to ignore the implications to a local economy of removing local amenities. Young families like to set up homes in areas near preferable school options and removing the local school will curtail some desirability to move to and settle in the town. Other families with school aged children might move to another school district altogether where the educational opportunities are superior. This will have a negative effect on property values and this effect could be significant.
So beginning next fall, 5 through 8 year olds of this small town will now stoically go off every day on an hour long school bus ride in place of the current 5 or 10 minute ride to school. They will be placed in inferior accommodations while their previous cozy home stands in good condition. Nostalgic students will be able to wave good bye to their old school as they ride past at the beginning of their journeys to the neighboring town.
Will life go on in this small town? Will the students be better off than their peers in poor and possibly war-ravaged villages in the eastern Congo or Afghanistan or even parts of Brooklyn? Yes without a doubt. But more to the point, did life get better or worse in the small town and was the right decision made on how to address the budget problems challenging the school district? Without a doubt, life got at least a little bit worse and the question remains, was it necessary?
Text Books in Trailers
Posted by: | Comments– John Leahy
Background Introduction:
New York State, like many states, is going along with the current trend in education policy to close outlying rural schools in a centralization initiative. The idea is to be fiscally more efficient by providing services for all at fewer locations. Children are brought by bus on longer commutes to one central location in the school district, rather than maintaining satellite local schools in their own communities where the commuting time for the children is shorter as they attend school in the town or village where they live. The policy, particularly in the economic climate of year 2010, has caused a lot of debate and controversy as government bodies struggle to achieve more with smaller resources and local populations struggle to protect the quality of life in their communities. Often, local school boards in New York State are attempting to follow the State Commissioner’s directive irregardless of negative impacts on other aspects of community life or economics. This is the background framework for this recent letter to the editors at the Eastwick Press in Eastern Rensselaer County.
Local Schools
Posted by: | CommentsBy John Leahy
Background Introduction:
New York State, like many states, is going along with the current trend in education policy to close outlying rural schools in a centralization initiative. The idea is to be fiscally more efficient by providing services for all at fewer locations. Children are brought by bus on longer commutes to one central location in the school district, rather than maintaining satellite local schools in their own communities where the commuting time for the children is shorter as they attend school in the town or village where they live. The policy, particularly in the economic climate of year 2010, has caused a lot of debate and controversy as government bodies struggle to achieve more with smaller resources and local populations struggle to protect the quality of life in their communities. Often, local school boards in New York State are attempting to follow the State Commissioner’s directive irregardless of negative impacts on other aspects of community life or economics. This is the background framework for this recent letter to the editors at the Eastwick Press in Eastern Rensselaer County.
New Demographic Policy Guidance for Grafton School District
The Berlin Central School District wants to close the Grafton school and bus the Grafton kids down to the crumbling Berlin school building to save money for the district tax payers. Saving money will be important, especially as the loss of a local school will probably have a strong negative effect on Town of Grafton’s economy as desirability to locate in Grafton plummets, property values decline and tax revenues drop. Grafton residents, known for their enthusiasm for the rugged outdoors lifestyle, at least can take pleasure in knowing that their children will be brought up right as they will be exposed to plenty of fresh air as the windows of the Berlin school building are frequently kept wide open in winter to counterbalance the blasting heat that can’t be turned off in this antiquated building with its obsolete maintenance system. But no worries, mate! We will spend $15 or $20 or maybe $25 million dollars to renovate the myriad of problems in this building and that will save a lot of money and local tax payers will be very happy.
One major factor that was cited as a reason for closing the Grafton school was demographics. According to a tremendously in-depth consultant survey that must have taken at least a minimum of ten minutes to produce, the school age population of Grafton is shrinking. The consultant, using a scientifically rock solid methodology of basing projections for long term population trends on a mere 5 years of data, showed that Grafton school age population had dropped over a 5 year period (actually they mixed up Grafton and Stephentown data but no matter) and deduced with fool proof logic that this trend would continue indefinitely until someday down the road the empty halls of the Grafton school would only echo the foot steps of mice as the last remaining school age Grafton child walked out the door and took the rights of passage on the bus to 4th grade in Berlin. Naturally, the Berlin Central School District was wise enough to see the merit of this reasoning and has stoutly relied upon this splendid gem of a study as they repeated their mantra that centralization is always best, regardless of course of the costs to community quality of life.
In stating that Grafton adults are not producing enough children to bother educating them in their own town, one wonders what the consultant and the School District are really saying about the adults of Grafton. Could they be snidely implying that Grafton taxpayers are not pulling their weight and doing their fair share in reproductive activity? Should Grafton adult residents be engaging in more productive pastimes, rather than sinking into lethargy about local demographics as another evening spent with American Idol goes by? What would the Berlin Central School District say if Grafton residents went on a bacchanalian tear and drove the school age population up 20% with a Mardi Gras festive spirit? While Grafton stolidly reproduced, the Board would sure have egg on its face. This could be a new policy direction for Grafton taxpayers.
I mean, if you’re going to get a screwing anyway……